Author: Mary E. Williams
Title Of Article: Single-Sex Schools Do Not Deserve Support
Name of scholarly journal: Washington Post Writers Group
Database name: Opposing viewpoints
Publisher of database: Greenhaven Press
Where you accessed database: Home
Date of access: 02/03/09
URL:http://find.galegroup.com/ovrc/infomark.do?&contentSet=GSRC&type=retrieve&tabID=T010&prodId=OVRC&docId=EJ3010129255&source=gale&userGroupName=sunytccc&version=1.0
Authors Claim: There is no advantage with a single sex school as opposed to a co-ed school. There is nothing that shows that single sex schools enhance the education.
Evidence: The author says how we shouldn't have even come to this. Comparing gender to race. She says that Talking about segregating women in the classroom is just like seperating by race. It's discriminating. She states how we live in a co-ed world now and we should get used to it.
This author has valid points with good evedence to back it up
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Your "annotated bibliography" is not in the proper format. I pointed in class out that SAW has the format for the publication info on page 295 (Electronic Copy of a Periodical Article Retrieved from a Database), and there are examples of annotated bibliographic records on page 284. As I said, though, the annotations in those examples were not as thorough as what I expect on this assignment.
ReplyDelete